Logicheskie zadachi dlya doshkoljnikov. UNIDROIT CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL FACTORING (Ottawa, 28 May 1988) THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION, CONSCIOUS of the fact that international factoring has a significant role to play in the development of international trade. Pogledajte neke od naših radova. PRIKAŽI SVE 274 / Fotografija 9 / Industrijski dizajn 44 / Knjige i publikacije 31 / Korporativni dizajn 9 / Logo dizajn 70 / Magazini 20 / Prezentacije 5 / Print dizajn 59 / Screen dizajn 9 / Web sajtovi 18.

Marijampolės pieno konservai, UAB started to operate in 1977. Since 2001 it became a private company. This is one of the largest and highest performing milk processors in Lithuania, implementing newest technologies and aming for the highest quality of the products. We are the only canned milk producer in Baltic region. The production is carried out in accordance with the requirements of certified Food Safety (HAACP), Quality Management and Environmental Management systems. Certificates obtained: FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, ISO 9001 and ISO 14001. Today with almost 40 years of experience we are a trustworthy supplier for the partners abroad and valuable producer for the customers inside the country.

Israel launched Operation Protective Edge in the Gaza Strip on 8 July 2014 and ended it, after a ceasefire was declared, on 26 August 2014. During the operation, Israel violated international humanitarian law in some cases, and many other cases are highly suspect. However, B’Tselem does not intend to demand that these suspicions be investigated by Israel’s current investigation mechanisms. This is due to the experience that B’Tselem gained following past military offensives in the Gaza Strip, which shows that there is currently no official body in Israel capable of conducting independent investigations of suspected violations of international humanitarian law. Israel's law enforcement system, in its present form, cannot adequately address suspicions regarding the military’s conduct during attacks on the Gaza Strip in three major areas: • Investigating senior political officials and military commanders: The overall policy guiding the military's actions is laid out by senior political officials, who are also involved in making and authorizing operational decisions. Other decisions are made by senior military commanders whose rank is either equivalent to that of the MAG or higher.

In both cases, no mechanism exists for investigating the lawfulness of actions authorized on those levels. • The MAG's dual role: On one hand, the MAG gives legal counsel to the military before and during combat; on the other hand, he is responsible for deciding whether to open criminal investigations into soldiers' conduct. This dual role creates an inherent conflict of interests in cases where orders and commands given following the MAG's counsel raise suspicion that the law was breached. In these situations, the MAG – who was responsible for legally authorizing measures suspected of being unlawful – is charged with retrospectively deciding whether to initiate a criminal investigation into his own conduct and that of his subordinates. • Investigating incidents in which soldiers are suspected of having breached military orders: In the vast majority of such cases, investigations focus only on the conduct and responsibility of low-ranking soldiers and commanders in the field. First, an operational inquiry is usually carried out; then, the MAG decides whether to order an investigation by the Military Police Investigations Unit (MPIU) based on the inquiry's findings. In the rare instances in which an investigation is indeed opened, its findings are passed on to the MAG Corps, where the decision is made as to which measures – if any – are to be taken against the persons involved.

Carrying out an operational inquiry in the unit prior to an MPIU investigation delays the criminal investigation – sometimes by many months. Furthermore, it compromises the reliability of eyewitness accounts given by soldiers, who provide their versions during the operational inquiry. MPIU investigators often cannot reach the scene of the incident and have difficulty obtaining testimony from Palestinian victims or witnesses. These procedures are so lengthy that, in some cases, the MAG's decision whether or not to take steps against the perpetrators is made several years after the incident.

B'Tselem encountered these issues in the last two military offensives Israel conducted in the Gaza Strip – Operation Cast Lead (2009) and Operation Pillar of Defense (2012). Operation Cast Lead, December 2008 – January 2009 Operation Cast Lead took place in the Gaza Strip between 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2008. The harm to the civilian population during the fighting was massive: 1,391 Palestinians were killed, at least 759 of whom, including 318 minors under the age of 18, did not take part in the hostilities. More than 5,300 Palestinians were injured, 350 of them seriously. Israel caused immense damage to homes, to industrial and agricultural structures, and to electricity, sewage, water and health infrastructure. According to UN figures, Israel destroyed more than 3,500 homes, leaving 20,000 people homeless. When the fighting ended, eight Israeli human rights organizations, B’Tselem among them, wrote to the attorney general urging him to establish an independent investigation apparatus to examine suspected violations of international humanitarian law during the operation.